Re: Filter Priorities

On 4/29/2010 4:22 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've come across a situation that I don't think can be handled by
> TMDA alone, although I'd love to be corrected.
>
> It seems that incoming filter rules always take precedence over the
> default action, even when the default action is for a dated, sender
> or keyword address.  On the one hand, it's useful to drop mail for
> keyword addresses that are getting spammed.  On the other hand,
> sometimes the address serves a purpose that makes it a requirement to
> have acceptance when the address is used, and drop otherwise.  For
> instance, you want to reject all bounce messages unless they come to
> a dated address, in the fashion of BATV.
>
> Is it possible to arrange for the dated, keyword or sender address to
> override the incoming filter?

Why not just add an explicit rule for the TMDA address that needs the 
special handling?

Regards,
-- 
Dave Steinberg
http://www.geekisp.com/
http://www.steinbergcomputing.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users