Re: Filter Priorities

On 2 May 2010, at 14:26, Dave Steinberg wrote:
On 4/29/2010 4:22 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> It seems that incoming filter rules always take precedence over the
>> default action, even when the default action is for a dated, sender
>> or keyword address.  On the one hand, it's useful to drop mail for
>> keyword addresses that are getting spammed.  On the other hand,
>> sometimes the address serves a purpose that makes it a requirement to
>> have acceptance when the address is used, and drop otherwise.  For
>> instance, you want to reject all bounce messages unless they come to
>> a dated address, in the fashion of BATV.
>> 
>> Is it possible to arrange for the dated, keyword or sender address to
>> override the incoming filter?
> 
> Why not just add an explicit rule for the TMDA address that needs the 
> special handling?

That works, except you'd have to predict every address, which is impossible for dated addresses, for instance.

It's not that there's no solution, it just looks like it's outside TMDA.

Cheers,
Sabahattin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users