Re: squirrelmail tatar translation package

q.d wrote:
> 
> why most translators has set copyright to "SquirrelMail developers" -
> i do not know. i do not know who are they. do you, translators, know,
> that copyright owner can change licence? ok, maybe you do not bother
> if your translation is used in closed source commercial program and
> you are not paid. (probably many commercial programs are translated
> for free). and do you know that gnu gpl "punbb" forum script copyright
> is sold?
> 
People set copyrights to the team, when they feel that they are part of the
team. I prefer not to question people why they choose BSD, public domain or
some GPL version or why they choose to assign copyrights to some group.

Copyright owner can change the license only for newer package releases and
in case of SquirrelMail this copyright statement is not formal. There is no
legal entity called 'SquirrelMail Project' or 'SquirrelMail Developers'. All
code contributed to SquirrelMail belongs to contributors.

-- 
Tomas
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/squirrelmail-tatar-translation-package-tp30417614p30423733.html
Sent from the squirrelmail-i18n mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
squirrelmail-i18n mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
Information about translations: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/LanguageTranslation
Statistics for translations: http://l10n-stats.squirrelmail.org/
List address: [email protected]
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.internationalization
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-i18n