Re: To ***SPAM*** or not to ***SPAM***

Seems like a lot of extra steps when maia comes with scripts that run quarantined email (which should be pristine, btw)  through the Bayes engine of spamassassin if you use the recommended cron jobs.‎

Thanks,
-Larry


________________________________________________
Lawrence R. Mulder / RHCE, VTSP, SEC+
Vice President, InformAbility, Inc.
[email protected]
http://www.informability.com/about
http://www.facebook.com/InformAbility
Ph: 630-532-5941
Fx: 630-532-5955
________________________________________________
  Original Message
From: Bob
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Maia-users] To ***SPAM*** or not to ***SPAM***


For years I have had spamassassin mark spam with the asterisks and the
word spam in the subject. I have a condition in sieve that catches this.
Of course, all the mail marked this way also have the header "spam=Yes"
which is also in my filter. Every night I have a script that takes all
the mail in spam folders (cur and new) and runs it through the learn
process for Bayes. The Bayes filter is smart enough not to use the same
mail twice. I just wonder if changing the subject line is hurting the
Bayes evaluation.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Bob
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.renaissoft.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.renaissoft.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/maia-users