Re: status of bbdb3 support in wl?

Hello,

Ken Gunderson wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2016 03:43:31 -0600,
> Michael Welle wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > David Maus wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 04 Sep 2016 06:48:54 +0200,
> > > Michael Welle wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ken Gunderson skrev:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Cool that wanderlust is seeing some developer love.  From what I've
> > > > > > been able to surmise, however, Wanderlust still lacks ability to
> > > > > > integrate with bbdbv3?
> ....
> 
> > > There are indeed some suboptimal design in the current BBDBv3 code
> > > that make it hard to add support for other MUAs without modifying the
> > > BBDB.
> > yepp. I think that -and the lack of documentation for bbdb v3- is one
> > of the reasons why there wasn't support for bbdb v3 in wl for years.
> 
> Which is sadly really out of character for emacs ;(
well, you did not implement it, I did not implement it, so it's a bit
hard to complain too loud about it ;). I mean you could start with the
documentation for bbdb v2 and the source of bbdb v3. Over the years I
made a few attempts to build something. But I'm not a strong lisper
and it's hard work for me, so nothing came out of it.

Regards
hmw