Re: .elmo/cache
Rob Walker <[email protected]> Sun, 06 May 2018 21:04:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.wanderlust.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <85in80p0v4.wl-rob__13553.3870583915$1525665855$gmane$org@ladle.net> |
Thomas, Not only do I delete my .elmo/cache directory whenever I get too confused about how WL works, I believe there is some data stored there that you *must* clean out if you change certain variables. Whenever I modify the follwing variables, I delete that directory. wl-message-sort-field-list wl-message-ignored-field-list elmo-msgdb-extra-fields There may be more, I am not sure. I think that it would be really cool if WL was able to also cache the state of those variables, and then if it was to detect a change, invalidate the cache as needed. Thanks, Rob On Sun, 06 May 2018 13:28:35 -0700, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > From memory, cuz it has been a while since I did this; I am pretty > sure it is safe to nuke it, as it will be recreated upon a full sync. > This presumes IMAP account because I've never used Wanderlust > w/anything else, so cannot vouche for else ;D > > Caveat Emptor being.... how big a hurry you are in - may want to wait > for further confirmation if not. > > btw- Cool that you go to Duke. > > Rock on-- Ken > > On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:35:32 -0600, > Thomas Narten wrote: > > > > I've wondered this for a while and suspect I know the answer... > > > > Is .elmo/cache 100% just a cache? I.e., safe to delete, no need save > > when doing backups? > > > > In past, when my WL got really whacked, I've deleted the directory and > > nothing bad seems to happen. It just gets recreated and life goes on. > > > > Mine is 1.5GB in size at moment... > > > > Is there a proper way to delete/cleanout the cache? > > > > Note: I know about things like: > > > > > ;;days since last access, i.e atime. (default: 50) > > > (elmo-cache-expire-by-age 14) > > > > > > ;;kilobytes (default 30000) > > > (elmo-cache-expire-by-size 1024) > > > > which are more about keeping the cache in check long term. I'm asking > > about completely deleting it. > > > > Thomas > > >