Re: Removing \M-s binding

Ken Gunderson <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:53:16 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.wanderlust.general
Organization Teamcool Networks
Message-ID <86v9vrmqlf.wl-kgunders__43876.1284503684$1563980111$gmane$org@teamcool.net>
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 04:37:54 -0600,
Greg Bognar wrote:
> 
> > > Since wl-save is already bound to \C-x \C-s, I wonder if the \M-s binding
> > > could simply be removed in WL.  (Just a matter of deleting line 212 in
> > > wl-folder.el.)
> > 
> > I don't know why wl-save has two key bindings, but I think we can simply
> > remove M-s binding to wl-save.
> 
> Great.
> 
> > > Relatedly, \M-s is bound to wl-summary-stick (a very useful command) in
> > > wl-summary-mode-map.  If WL's bindings should not override Emacs's general
> > > bindings (and I think they shouldn't), perhaps that binding should be
> > > changed too.
> > 
> > You are right except the case Wanderlust intendedly override.  The point is
> > that which key should be bound to wl-summary-stick.  If there is no
> > suggestion, I'm going to bind M-S to wl-summary-stick.
> 
> M-S is the same as M-s, so that still overrides Emacs's search-map binding. s
> and S are already bound.
> 
> What about +?  + is currently not bound in wl-summary-mode-map, and it is sort
> of an obvious choice.

Seems strange to me.  M-s is undefined on a freshly launched Emacs,
sans any modes, unless I am in Wanderlust and in Summary buffer, in
wh/case both M-s and M-S offer to stick summary buffer.  Makes total
sense to me.  I don't understand the issue here?

Meanwhils, C-s is isearch forward, as expected.  I am not an Emacs
guru though and unsure what "search-map" is actually referencing.

Best-- Ken