Re: Removing \M-s binding
Ken Gunderson <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:53:16 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.wanderlust.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Teamcool Networks |
| Message-ID | <86v9vrmqlf.wl-kgunders__43876.1284503684$1563980111$gmane$org@teamcool.net> |
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 04:37:54 -0600, Greg Bognar wrote: > > > > Since wl-save is already bound to \C-x \C-s, I wonder if the \M-s binding > > > could simply be removed in WL. (Just a matter of deleting line 212 in > > > wl-folder.el.) > > > > I don't know why wl-save has two key bindings, but I think we can simply > > remove M-s binding to wl-save. > > Great. > > > > Relatedly, \M-s is bound to wl-summary-stick (a very useful command) in > > > wl-summary-mode-map. If WL's bindings should not override Emacs's general > > > bindings (and I think they shouldn't), perhaps that binding should be > > > changed too. > > > > You are right except the case Wanderlust intendedly override. The point is > > that which key should be bound to wl-summary-stick. If there is no > > suggestion, I'm going to bind M-S to wl-summary-stick. > > M-S is the same as M-s, so that still overrides Emacs's search-map binding. s > and S are already bound. > > What about +? + is currently not bound in wl-summary-mode-map, and it is sort > of an obvious choice. Seems strange to me. M-s is undefined on a freshly launched Emacs, sans any modes, unless I am in Wanderlust and in Summary buffer, in wh/case both M-s and M-S offer to stick summary buffer. Makes total sense to me. I don't understand the issue here? Meanwhils, C-s is isearch forward, as expected. I am not an Emacs guru though and unsure what "search-map" is actually referencing. Best-- Ken