Re: "open source"? or not?
Zoe <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:32:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.zoe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 31, 2005, at 02:16, Jos wrote: >> Anyone has an opinion on this subject? >> This seems to have originate here: >> http://lemonodor.com/archives/001043.html#c7988 >> And there: >> http://www.haloscan.com/comments/taoofmac/blog_2005_01_13/#53346 >> Feedbacks greatly appreciated! :) > > Huh. Well it seems that somebody has a bee in their bonnet for > definitions. They may be technically correct that Zoe does not fit the > OSI "open source" definition, but i'd have to ask, why do they care? > Seems like a black-ball attempt to further their own agenda. But i > could be paranoid. ;) Yea... kind of weird. It's not because some fly-by-night site pompously calling itself "Open Source Initiative" put up some random pages containing some far fetched claims, that it make it so. Whatever. Cheers, R. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl