Re: "open source"? or not?

Zoe <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:32:59 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.zoe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jan 31, 2005, at 02:16, Jos wrote:

>> Anyone has an opinion on this subject?
>> This seems to have originate here:
>> http://lemonodor.com/archives/001043.html#c7988
>> And there:
>> http://www.haloscan.com/comments/taoofmac/blog_2005_01_13/#53346
>> Feedbacks greatly appreciated! :)
>
> Huh. Well it seems that somebody has a bee in their bonnet for 
> definitions. They may be technically correct that Zoe does not fit the 
> OSI "open source" definition, but i'd have to ask, why do they care? 
> Seems like a black-ball attempt to further their own agenda. But i 
> could be paranoid. ;)

Yea... kind of weird. It's not because some fly-by-night site pompously 
calling itself "Open Source Initiative" put up some random pages 
containing some far fetched claims, that it make it so.

Whatever.

Cheers,

R.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl