Re: David Cross on Health Care

"Karl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <013f01cb7493$ba3c9c60$2eb5d520$@com>
Oh stop Peter, I am assured by almost all liberals that there are NO waiting
lists in Canada.  Enough of your nonsense, I say...

(rolling eyes)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Peter T. Chattaway
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:10 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] David Cross on Health Care

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, pcg wrote:
> For my part, as long as the government is only discontinuing care, and
> not actively preventing care from continuing (as funded by other
> sources), then I'm okay with it.

So you'd be opposed to the one- or two- or three-year waiting lists that
people sometimes find themselves on here?  In your country, at least,
patients with the means to do so could "jump the queue" and pay for
someone to give those services pronto -- but in my country, where even
so-called "conservative" politicians scorn the "two-tier" option, it's
somehow seen as a travesty of justice if someone gets less-crappy
treatment than anyone else.

Note: this applies to certain medical procedures specifically.  When my
son needed to be diagnosed with autism (the sooner the better, so that we
would have the paperwork necessary to qualify for government-funded autism
treatment), we were able to "jump the queue" and take him to a private
psychologist, instead of waiting a full year for the government-provided
psychologist.  But there are all sorts of other services where, as I
understand it, the "private" option simply wouldn't exist.

--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot



-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.