Re: BSG, Firefly, and Babylon 5
Johne Cook <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Warehouse 13 strikes me as Creature Tech-lite. I don't know anything about Sanctuary. I tried Torchwood. I liked what I saw in the first season, but for my tastes, the leader of the group was becoming too... something. Johne Cook | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com | On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > What about Warehouse 13 or Sanctuary? > > > > Also were you into Torchwood at all? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Johne Cook > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:52 PM > *To:* DADL (off topic) > *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] BSG, Firefly, and Babylon 5 > > > > Two quick things: > One, I'd never thought about *Firefly* as the quest for paradise. I wonder > if Joss outlined that in or it just appeared, organicly, as a by-product of > his well-drawn characters. > Two, I bet I would have loved *BSG* had I seen it before *Firefly*. > However, trying to see anything after *Firefly* is going to be difficult. > It so perfectly scratched an itch that I never knew I had that everything > remotely close in genre tastes empty to me (or worse, bitter). I tried to > get into *Doctor Who*. I tried to get into *BSG*. I tried to get into *B5*. > Nothing has come close. > > Sigh. > > (I'm holding out some small hope for *Jasper Squad*, but the author needs > to finish the frackin' story first.) ; ) > > Johne Cook > | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com | > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:34 PM, pcg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here's an excerpt from a BSG review that I found interesting. The > writer compares the underlying philosophies of the show with both > Firefly and Babylon 5 (a show I've never seen). > > http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/newbsgseason1.php > > [ ... ] > > On the run and with little chance of defending itself, humanity may > not have much of a future. To give the survivors hope, Adama tells > them of a safe haven far away, a lost colony known as Earth. He knows > the way, if they will only follow him and never give up. > > He is lying. > > It is this last detail, Adama's necessary lie—the pragmatic, perhaps > cynical, approach to the aftermath of war—that most strongly sets the > new Battlestar Galactica apart from its predecessor—and from most > other shows in this genre. The old Commander Adama would never lie, > because he was the good guy. And in melodrama, good guys don't lie. In > real drama, they do. But rather than make a sustained comparison > between the new BSG and the 1978 version, which has been done by > others, I want to evaluate why the show works in three steps. First, I > want to draw some comparisons between BSG and its most recent and > critically acclaimed antecedents, Babylon 5 and Firefly. (The > differences from the Star Trek franchise should be apparent as I > continue.) Then, I want to break down the key characters and their > relationships, because a survey of the plot threads of the first > season (so far, I've only taken you through the miniseries, which sets > up the show to follow) would be too complex and spoil too many > surprises. Finally, I want to focus on one episode, the series > premiere "33," in order to highlight the show's strengths and > weaknesses. > > Babylon 5 was a sprawling space opera. Joe Straczynski charted his > story 1,000 years in both directions, and there is a sense that the > main characters, as pivotal as they appear, are really just bumps in > the grand course of history. Replace one captain with another? Write > out one character and have another step in with similar powers or > prospects? While the emotional core of the series was always anchored > in the evolution of the characters, their role in the historical > process was almost modernist in sweep: Hope will endure because > evolution will endure. And the grand themes—good and evil, moral > responsibility—were drawn with wide gestures, even if the characters > themselves were a little gray. > > Firefly (and I am including Serenity here) was quite different. Joss > Whedon does not seem interested in grand themes of good and evil (he > never seemed particularly comfortable handling them in the Buffyverse > either, although he apparently felt they were necessary for the > mythology). Character interaction is the core of his more enclosed > universe. Apart from some political satire, there is only one key > theme developed over the course of the show: the quest for paradise. > The urban inner worlds versus the rural outer worlds—both sides are > looking for their little patch of heaven, and they have very different > definitions of what that heaven entails. The best episodes (as well as > the movie) work because we can follow the desires of the characters: > what they want, and what they will do to get that. Those desires drive > the engine of the series. > > Battlestar Galactica fits neatly in between both these shows, at least > with respect to its balance of character and theme. Ronald D. Moore > and David Eick have created, much like Firefly but unlike Bablon 5, a > hermetic environment. The human world is all there is: We created the > Cylons, we created the colonies, and now everything is coming apart. > (There are hints emerging in the series that the Cylons are developing > their own culture, but the details so far are sketchy.) There is a > desperate, linear focus to the series: We must survive. No "let's > explore the universe" or "let's set up a new life in a vast, open > space." There is no openness. The cramped command deck, tiny cockpits, > cluttered decks and quarters, fevered close-ups—the BSG universe is > always tightly enclosed. Characters sweat. The desaturated color and > murky lighting make everything on the battlestar appear oily and > uncomfortable. Even exterior locations like the planet Caprica are > filmed from low angles and in dense forests or abandoned ruins. One > day, open space might beckon, but for now, heads are down and focused > on the immediacy of the situation. > > In fact, open space is a threat on BSG. On B5, space is potential, > progress. You never know who will be around the next corner. On > Firefly, space is freedom, the distance you can put between yourself > and those who oppress you. On Galactica, space is an obstacle, either > for the humans to get around or for the humans to use as a roadblock > to stall the Cylon advance. There is none of the "wonder of space" > that marks nearly all other science-fiction television. Space is dark, > empty, and very cold. > > If this sounds depressing, well, Battlestar Galactica is in part about > surviving a catastrophe. The characters are trying to work through > their immediate problems, and their survival, even their hope, is only > achieved incrementally. Curiously, this makes every small victory on > the show taste a little sweeter, because you can never be sure they > will succeed enough in the task of the moment (finding water, finding > fuel, surviving this attack) to get them a step ahead on the next > crisis. So when they do take that small step ahead, the show feels > momentarily invigorated. > > But (and here is where the show is more like Straczynski than Whedon), > Ron Moore and David Eick are also interested in exploring questions > about the nature of evil, the complex role religion plays in our > political identity, and the problem of cultural perspective. The > Cylons believe they have a holy mission (the parallels here to 9/11 > have been much discussed already by fans), that their one god has > plans for the heathen polytheists of the human race. These plans, as > they have evolved over the course of the series thus far, are far more > complicated than the usual "kill 'em all" of melodramatic villains. > > (more at the link, but this was the bit I found interesting) > > -- > -pcg > [email protected] > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > > > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot