>Context please. I Think it was pretty clear we were talking about the US house. But for the >republican victories and change of majority in the house you wouldn't have brought up >cooperation and we wouldn't be having this discussion.
So not true. I have wanted there to be cooperation since 2008 and said so in the past.
>But along with things I find interesting I have to include that now that the republicans are in the >majority, (in the house), you are expecting them to cooperate in order to get things >done. When for the last two years they have not been in control of anything and couldn't >prevent anything from being done.
If that were the case, every single thing Obama wanted would have passed. More than one bill needed Republican support to succeed, because there was a required rule requiring the majority to be at least 60.
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.