Re: Apparently, he did not get the Memo...

Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm not saying do away with associations and alignments...I'm saying  
do away with official party affiliations in government.

regards,
-Lance


On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Mike Findlay wrote:

> Not to mention the 1st amendment.  I don't like the parties but  
> there's that freedom of speech, association thing....
>
> From: Karl <[email protected]>
> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 12:13:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo...
>
> How on earth can you not have people aligning by ideology?
>
> I mean, I get what you are saying, but in a practical sense, how can  
> you ever mange it?
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]  
> On Behalf Of Lance McLain
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:28 AM
> To: DADL (off topic)
> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo...
>
> I think it is time to do away with political parties.  They are the  
> cause of so much of what is wrong with our political system...the  
> catalyst to the money and financing corruption so prevalent in  
> government.  I think George Washington was correct:
>
> “The common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are  
> sufficient to make it the interest of a wise people to discourage  
> and restrain it.  It serves always to distract the public counsels  
> and enfeeble the public administration.  It agitates the community  
> with ill founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity  
> of one part against another, foments occasional riot and  
> insurrection.  It opens the door to foreign influence and  
> corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself  
> through the channels of party passions.”
>
> regards,
> -Lance
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Johne Cook wrote:
>
>
> Huh. I didn't vote against any EHA.
>
> I voted against a party that was so arrogant and corrupt that they  
> signed contracts forcing the new Republican administration to honor  
> contracts totaling $810 million for a high speed rail line the  
> state's denizens don't want. It's like selling a house and then  
> after signing the papers, leaving the new homeowners on the hook for  
> a new roof, garage, and windows. It's dirty pool at its best.
> http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/106488923.html
>
> Johne Cook
> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council that is.  He apparently  
> doesn't see the Republican Victory as merely a reaction to out of  
> control spending.  He thinks the Tea Party and other Americans who  
> voted Republican were sending this message:
> http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/frc-even-after-voters-reject-his-agenda-president-obama-still-doesnt-get-it-106635993.html
>
> "Last night millions of Americans went to the polls to express their  
> strong disagreement with the change President Obama has brought to  
> Washington . Out of control spending, government takeovers of health  
> care and other private enterprise and an allegiance to a pro- 
> abortion/anti-family coalition are all issues the American people  
> said 'Enough!' to last night.
>
> "When it comes to the homosexual agenda, the American people could  
> not be clearer. The flipping of at least six state legislatures, the  
> defeat of three justices in Iowa who imposed same-sex 'marriage' and  
> the defeat of the House Member leading the charge to overturn the  
> current military policy are all examples of how the American people  
> have grown tired of the Democratic Party's adherence to an anti- 
> family coalition.
>
> "I agree with the President that Congress should wait for the coming  
> report from the military on changing the current policy. However,  
> that does not mean Congress should rubber stamp any study. The study  
> itself is likely to have problems, and the next natural step would  
> be to have the new 112th Congress hold hearings on the issue.
>
> "The arrogance of the President and his allies in Congress, many of  
> whom will not return in the new Congress, to force such a drastic  
> change on our military in the middle of fighting two wars is  
> disrespectful of our troops, and should not be tolerated."
> --------------
> Out of control spending was a part of it...but it was really a  
> statement against the Evil Homosexual Agenda.
> Thom
> http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
> http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
> http://www.in-one-ear.com
> _______________________________________
> "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the  
> Bunnymen
>
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
> -- 
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
> -- 
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.