Re: Apparently, he did not get the Memo...
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm not saying do away with associations and alignments...I'm saying do away with official party affiliations in government. regards, -Lance On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Mike Findlay wrote: > Not to mention the 1st amendment. I don't like the parties but > there's that freedom of speech, association thing.... > > From: Karl <[email protected]> > To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 12:13:47 PM > Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo... > > How on earth can you not have people aligning by ideology? > > I mean, I get what you are saying, but in a practical sense, how can > you ever mange it? > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Lance McLain > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:28 AM > To: DADL (off topic) > Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo... > > I think it is time to do away with political parties. They are the > cause of so much of what is wrong with our political system...the > catalyst to the money and financing corruption so prevalent in > government. I think George Washington was correct: > > “The common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are > sufficient to make it the interest of a wise people to discourage > and restrain it. It serves always to distract the public counsels > and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community > with ill founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity > of one part against another, foments occasional riot and > insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and > corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself > through the channels of party passions.” > > regards, > -Lance > > > On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Johne Cook wrote: > > > Huh. I didn't vote against any EHA. > > I voted against a party that was so arrogant and corrupt that they > signed contracts forcing the new Republican administration to honor > contracts totaling $810 million for a high speed rail line the > state's denizens don't want. It's like selling a house and then > after signing the papers, leaving the new homeowners on the hook for > a new roof, garage, and windows. It's dirty pool at its best. > http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/106488923.html > > Johne Cook > | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com | > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council that is. He apparently > doesn't see the Republican Victory as merely a reaction to out of > control spending. He thinks the Tea Party and other Americans who > voted Republican were sending this message: > http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/frc-even-after-voters-reject-his-agenda-president-obama-still-doesnt-get-it-106635993.html > > "Last night millions of Americans went to the polls to express their > strong disagreement with the change President Obama has brought to > Washington . Out of control spending, government takeovers of health > care and other private enterprise and an allegiance to a pro- > abortion/anti-family coalition are all issues the American people > said 'Enough!' to last night. > > "When it comes to the homosexual agenda, the American people could > not be clearer. The flipping of at least six state legislatures, the > defeat of three justices in Iowa who imposed same-sex 'marriage' and > the defeat of the House Member leading the charge to overturn the > current military policy are all examples of how the American people > have grown tired of the Democratic Party's adherence to an anti- > family coalition. > > "I agree with the President that Congress should wait for the coming > report from the military on changing the current policy. However, > that does not mean Congress should rubber stamp any study. The study > itself is likely to have problems, and the next natural step would > be to have the new 112th Congress hold hearings on the issue. > > "The arrogance of the President and his allies in Congress, many of > whom will not return in the new Congress, to force such a drastic > change on our military in the middle of fighting two wars is > disrespectful of our troops, and should not be tolerated." > -------------- > Out of control spending was a part of it...but it was really a > statement against the Evil Homosexual Agenda. > Thom > http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ > http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade > http://www.in-one-ear.com > _______________________________________ > "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the > Bunnymen > > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot