Re: Reject the Welfare/Warfare State
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I don't know that I disagee, though I think there are a couple Tea Party republicans that got elected that will support such cuts inlcuding Rand Paul, Col. West and Marco Rubio, But what I wonder is why do you support the party that is advocating more spending? Mike F. ________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, November 8, 2010 2:15:44 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Reject the Welfare/Warfare State >Real reductions in federal spending can be achieved only by getting to the meat of the federal budget, meaning expenditures in all areas. The annual budget soon will be $5 trillion unless Congress takes serious steps to reduce spending for entitlements, military, and debt service. Yet how many Tea Party candidates who campaigned on a platform of spending cuts talked about Social Security, Medicare, foreign wars, or bond debt?<< >AMEN!!!!!!!! We need an across the board spending cut. Not the bullshit >reduction in increase that D.C. calls cuts but a real, honest reduction real >spending. Unlikely. Most of the cuts I see Republicans suggesting will barely make a dent. There is no way Republicans will cut military spending-which is some of our heaviest spending. It's a nice dream though. Thom http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade http://www.in-one-ear.com _______________________________________ "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot