Re: Reject the Welfare/Warfare State

Even a freeze would be a good start.
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:19 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Reject the Welfare/Warfare State
 
I don't know that I disagee, though I think there are a couple Tea Party
republicans that got elected that will support such cuts inlcuding Rand Paul,
Col. West and Marco Rubio,
 
But what I wonder is why do you support the party that is advocating more
spending?
 
Mike F. 
 
  _____  

From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, November 8, 2010 2:15:44 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Reject the Welfare/Warfare State
>Real reductions in federal spending can be achieved only by getting to the 
meat of the federal budget, meaning expenditures in all areas.  The annual 
budget soon will be $5 trillion unless Congress takes serious steps to reduce 
spending for entitlements, military, and debt service. Yet how many Tea Party 
candidates who campaigned on a platform of spending cuts talked about Social 
Security, Medicare, foreign wars, or bond debt?<<

>AMEN!!!!!!!!   We need an across the board spending cut.  Not the bullshit 
>reduction in increase that D.C. calls cuts but a real, honest reduction real 
>spending.  
 
Unlikely.  Most of the cuts I see Republicans suggesting will barely make a
dent.  There is no way Republicans will cut military spending-which is some of
our heaviest spending.  It's a nice dream though.
 
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot