Re: Death penalty
"Karl D. Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000c01cb7fd6$412ce020$c386a060$@com> |
If the system was not slow and thorough and allowing of appeal and reviews and scrutiny, both internally and externally, then there would not be time to find the evidence. IF we convicted and killed on the same day there would be no chance would there? We don't. The system is weighted heavily in favor of appeals, that's why it takes decades. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pcg Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 8:21 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Death penalty > It is valid though. And the fact that they do get exonerated actually proves > the point. > > I have yet to find one proven example. You're babbling, here. The fact that they get exonerated by *external* factors proves, absolutely, the precise *opposite* of your point. -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot