Re: Death penalty
pcg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> In the interest of saving innocent hairs from being split, I'll just > say that the state shouldn't be in the business of retribution *or* > vengeance. > > **or justice? Killing someone who has killed does not in any way create justice. >> The economics argument is irrelevant and probably >> in the current state of appellate law weighs in favor or >> life imprisonment so don't attribute that one to me. > > Fair enough, then. It's it's not a deterrent, it's not just, and it's > not economical. > > ***It is, it is and it is. I'm confused. I said killing people is economical, you replied that it wasn't. I conceded your point -- and now you're saying it is? Are you arguing any point just for the sake of it, or what? At any rate, at least we can agree that the economics of the question are irrelevant. -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot