Re: resurrecting ts3

And by the way, I disagree that the toys are adverse to being passed to a new
owner.  The clear premise is that they want to be played with and they want to
be loved.  They only feared not being toys any more.  It was being tossed in the
trash or the attic they feared.  Being discarded.

When the group first got to Sunnyside they thought it would be good, and they
jumped on board happily.  They eventually didn’t like Sunnyside, but not because
of new owners, it was because of the abuse factor.

Likewise, going to Bonnie was a happy solution, even if it had sadness at
watching Andy leave.

They didn’t fear change as much as they did being cast off and unused.  The
message from TS3 was one of purpose.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Peter T. Chattaway
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:29 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] resurrecting ts3

On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Karl wrote:
> I will disagree on the conclusion.
> The premise in ts3 is a more logical conclusion to the franchise.

Oh hardly.  TS2 established that Woody is a 50- or 60-year-old that has
almost certainly been passed from owner to owner before.  Yet the whole
premise of TS3 is that these toys can't *bear* the thought of being passed
to a new owner, or that they don't know how to deal or cope with it.

--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot