Re: [Bulk] Re: Death penalty

"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <A47985B729D04C18AAD2240EE4377F52@MikePC>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> That is a really flawed analogy.  The woman in your scenario is not even
> remotely analogous to a murderer, and flirting is on a different planet 
> than
> murder.

>Yeah, I figured we'd spend more time focusing on the differences of
the analogy than the similarities.<

When there are lots of the former and none of the latter what do you expect? 
To be fair I can see where you are going with it, but I think it trivializes 
murder.

IIRC the original point was that the death penalty is a consequence to 
committing the crime of murder.  But for the murder there would be no death 
penalty, (just to be clear, for discussion purposes I'm talking about 
unequivocal guilt cases), so it is rather easy to avoid.

Mike F.



-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.