Re: US may disable all in-car mobile phones
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
FWIW, I passed this story to my dad, and he replied:
- - -
Huh. Mom's new car came with built-in bluetooth and voice command (not
that she's used it yet). This law would go the opposite way.
And what about Onstar? If the jammer ("scrambler" is the wrong word,
ignorant journalist) was to stay on when the driver needs Onstar in an
emergency -- well, I can see lawsuits.
Years ago the US required a switch in the driver's seat and logic that
would only let you start the car if you first sat down, then fastened the
belt. After a lawsuit by someone who was beaten up by thugs because he
couldn't start his car in a hurry to escape, the law was quietly repealed
and dealers were told to deactivate the system (there may even have been a
recall).
I think all cars should come with built-in hands-free phones, with the
last few calls recorded on the black box (you didn't know your car has a
black box? It provides info for accident investigators including speed,
acceleration, gas and brake pedal position, etc.) Then let people use
them and learn to do so wisely. If we allow the government to put jammers
in cars, we might as well go back to having our horseless carriages
preceeded by a man with a flag to warn pedestrians.
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot