Re: [Scalzi] Is Science Fiction this generation's Western?
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> http://www.filmcritic.com/features/2010/12/is-science-fiction-this-eras-western/ > With all due apologies to my correspondent, I don't know that the idea > that science fiction is the new Western is all that groundbreaking -- if > nothing else, the first *Toy Story* made it explicit that the frontier > of space was replacing the Wild West as the locus of the imagination > when it had Buzz Lightyear eclipse Woody as the cool toy. And then Toy Story 2 revealed that the eclipsing had begun in 1957, when Woody's TV show was cancelled following the launch of Sputnik. > . . . the most financially successful Western of the last decade is the > one about two gay cowboys . . . Well, um, shepherds, actually. They herded sheep. They didn't herd cows. And they only have that job during the first act of the movie. > *1. It's infinite.* The general era in which the classic Westerns took > place is between 1850 and 1900, with the 1880s (the era of the gunfight > at the O.K. Corral) being ground zero for Western mythology, and it's > all -- by definition -- taking place in the U.S. West. Hey, what about Canada!? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot