Re: oh please.
pcg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Only someone who has it in for Palin would be focusing on her referring > to the constitution as a sacred document as if it is unusual. 4-7 easily > apply to her use of the word. Give me a break. > My astonishment isn't because the word cannot, in any sense, be applied. My astonishment is that any reasonably responsible individual would choose to enshroud a government document with language that is literally applicable to religious texts. That's bonkers. And I'll thank you not to speak to my motivations. I don't "have it in" for Palin. I'm befuddled by her popularity, and put off by her "aw, shucks" persona, but she's every bit as entitled to weigh in as anyone else. -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot