Re: oh please.
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:49 PM, pcg <[email protected]> wrote: > My astonishment isn't because the word cannot, in any sense, be applied. > My astonishment is that any reasonably responsible individual would choose > to enshroud a government document with language that is literally applicable > to religious texts. That's bonkers. > It's bonkers for Palin to use definition #4 of the word when people could misinterpret her as using definition #1? Usually people adapt to the given context, applying to most probably definition. I think that should apply here. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot