Re: oh please.
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Actually, the real context was the meme that the republicans are suddenly guilty of this despite the evidence that both sides do it all the time. This all came about when they blamed palin and said she had blood on her hands. And I would say that the violent rhetoric during the anti war rallies and such was significantly more dangerous as it often was directed at real people. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter T. Chattaway Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:21 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] oh please. On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Karl wrote: > Not entirely. It is also dependent on the things she says in > conjunction, and all manner of other elements unique to the person > speaking. which is the whole point of "context" in the first place: > to understand what the person meant. *Exactly*. And the *context* here was the current discussion re: loaded rhetoric of the sort that Palin and her ilk have used. In that *context*, she should steer cleer of loaded rhetoric. That is all. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot