Re: oh please.

I thought it was clear in context. I will leave it to you to decide if you
want to go back and ferret it out.

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>wrote:

> So then you were doing the same with your question?  I mean if you knew
> what I was doing what was the point of asking me about it.
>
> Mike F.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Johne Cook <[email protected]>
> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 5:27:20 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.
>
> I thought what Karl thought.
>
> Johne Cook
> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  You are demonstrating why the quote needs to be quoted completely,
>> instead of taken out of context in order to make a point.
>>
>> But you didn't answer my question - did you really think that I was trying
>> to further make the point, of the quote, when I bolded and enlarged the
>> font.
>>
>> Mike F.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Johne Cook <[email protected]>
>> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 5:16:42 PM
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.
>>
>> Perhaps 'Fuck civility' works better in theory than in practice then, eh,
>> Mike? ; )
>>
>> Johne Cook
>> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  And you really thought that was what I was doing?  Speaking of
>>> dense.....
>>>
>>> Mike F.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Johne Cook <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 5:12:30 PM
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.
>>>
>>> Are you dense? Shouting louder to make a point more salient or attractive
>>> is a fool's errand. (I will resist the urge to increase the font or bolding
>>> to increase your comprehension of this statement.)
>>>
>>> Johne Cook
>>> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Are you serious?
>>>>
>>>> Mike F.
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>> *From:* Johne Cook <[email protected]>
>>>> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 5:03:35 PM
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.
>>>>
>>>> When one believes their point is made more relevant because of how
>>>> passionately they increase the font and bolding, the point is already lost.
>>>>
>>>> Johne Cook
>>>> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  No, it need to be bolded and a larger font.
>>>>>
>>>>> *"Fuck Civility. Hyperbole, passion, and metaphor are beautiful parts
>>>>> of rhetoric. Marketplace of ideas can not be toned down for the insane."
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* Johne Cook <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 4:56:42 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you really think the idea is going to be made any clearer if you
>>>>> just say it louder or say it over and over again?
>>>>>
>>>>> Johne Cook
>>>>> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Just requoting so the context isn't left out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  "Fuck Civility. Hyperbole, passion, and metaphor are beautiful parts
>>>>>> of rhetoric. Marketplace of ideas can not be toned down for the insane."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike F.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>> *From:* pcg <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 4:49:59 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I'm with Penn Jillette:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > "Fuck Civility.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, fair enough, then.  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -pcg
>>>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> dadl-ot mailing list
>>>>>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>>>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> dadl-ot mailing list
>>>>>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>>>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> dadl-ot mailing list
>>>>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> dadl-ot mailing list
>>>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> dadl-ot mailing list
>>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> dadl-ot mailing list
>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>>
>
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot