Re: oh please.

> > When people say you've contributed to a culture of rudeness, I don't
> > think "Fuck you" is necessarily the best reply.  At least not if
> > you're going to claim the high ground, as she seems to do in the
> > rest of the video.
>
> If she had actually said that I would agree.

My point is that she said that *in effect* by continuing to use loaded rhetoric
at a time when her rhetoric is coming under closer scrutiny.

**sacred is not loaded rhetoric, sorry.    Blood libel maybe but as I said, I
refuse to be upset when she is being blamed for a mass murder that she might
come out swinging.

> When falsely accused, the person accused has a right to refute it.

Yes, but not in a way that self-incriminates.  When the accusation is that she
uses loaded rhetoric, it would be helpful to her cause if her reply did not
contain any loaded rhetoric.

**I think you are really just picking the nits here.




-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot