Re: oh please.
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > So you're conceding that calling the constitution sacred is an american > thing, but then why single out Palin for it? Because she's Christian, not Mormon. > Also, I'm not making this case at all, but who gets to say whether a > particular document was divinely inspired or not? I know catholics, and > I'm guessing orthodox, have a procedure for that but are non > catholics/orthodox bound by it? An interesting question, especially in light of the fact that the Old Testament that Protestants have been using for the last 500 years is based on the post-Christian Jewish Bible, and not on the Christian Bible that had been in use for the 1500 years prior to the Reformation. > And what is the real harm if some american christian has the belief that > the constitution is a divinely inspired document? Beats me. All I know is that the early Christians died for their faith rather than make sacrifices to Caesar. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot