Re: oh please.

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Karl wrote:

>>> When people say you've contributed to a culture of rudeness, I don't 
>>> think "Fuck you" is necessarily the best reply.  At least not if 
>>> you're going to claim the high ground, as she seems to do in the rest 
>>> of the video.
>>
>> If she had actually said that I would agree.
>
> My point is that she said that *in effect* by continuing to use loaded 
> rhetoric at a time when her rhetoric is coming under closer scrutiny.
>
> **sacred is not loaded rhetoric, sorry.  Blood libel maybe . . .

Yes, that is the term I had in mind.  "Sacred" *is* a loaded term, but not 
in the way that "blood libel" is, at least not in this context.

> . . . but as I said, I refuse to be upset when she is being blamed for a 
> mass murder that she might come out swinging.

Sorry, but I blame *everybody* here.  The liberals who hijacked this 
atrocity just encouraged Palin to keep on Palin-izing, and I call a pox on 
*both* their houses.

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot