Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I appreciate the honesty but I'm sorry you guys are really nitpicking. Mike F. ________________________________ From: Johne Cook <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 1:22:13 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...) I've thought about this. I try to put myself in the other guy's shoes. I first thought of 'venerable' but it also contains a religious vibe. I checked-down to 'revered' but discarded that for the same reason. I finally wound up with 'greatly esteemed' (where the focus is horizontal, esteem coming from men, rather the vertical, blessed by God). Johne Cook | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com | On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Peter T. Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > >Would anybody, objecting to the use of sacred, had a problem if she had said >"revered" instead? >> It wouldn't have been *as* bad, but it still wouldn't have been the best word to use, or even in the top ten. >-- >dadl-ot mailing list >http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot