Re: Obama takes opportunity Palin missed
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > > And there were better ways to respond and worse ways to respond. Not > all >responses are equal. That's the point here. > > But I've said that myself. >You have? Seems to me you and Karl have largely adopted an "anything she said >would have been attacked so it didn't matter what she said" stance here. (It's >kind of like saying "we're all going to die no matter what, so it doesn't matter >how we live", isn't it?)< I have, but I'm not inclined to prove it to you if you didn't read my responses in such a manner that you glossed over it. Mike F. > We were talking about the use of sacred and blood libel and whether she was >"wrong" to use either of those. Yes, the "blood libel" bit in particular would fall under the category of "worse way" rather than "better way". -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot