Re: Palin's secret message
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I dont recall "blood libel" being used specifically, but I dont remember all that well. An archive search confirms we discussed Gibson's blood libel in 2004. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter T. Chattaway Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 3:01 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Palin's secret message On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > > > And I'll bet you not more than 1 in 10 evangelicals know the > > > history of "blood libel" . . . > > > > Quite possibly. I'm sure many of them were plugging their ears when > > Jews and others wanted to discuss the historical significance of > > "blood libel" during the controversy over The Passion of the Christ. > > You're not going to start that again are you? Start what? The fact is, there was a national discussion -- and a rather intense one -- over the subject of "blood libel" just seven years ago. Are evangelical memories really *that* short? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot