Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Bruce Geerdes wrote: >>> I'd argue the other countries' religion/nationalism mix is worse as >>> others have national religions. >> >> Except most of those other countries are turning increasingly secular >> and nobody even *cares* about the national religions there any more. > > Mostly true for Europe, but I could see that changing. > > Then you have other parts of the world like India, the Middle East, > Africa. Or are we only talking about First World countries? Hmmm, when you said "national religion" I may have thought "state church", which of course would narrow my focus to Christianity (i.e. churches). But, sure, if you're looking at, say, a Muslim theocracy like Iran, then that's definitely worse. (Does India *have* an official religion, BTW? I know the British separated India from Pakistan and Bangladesh along religious lines, purely as a matter of demographics -- majority Hindus over here and majority Muslims over there -- but was Hinduism ever made the *official* religion of the Indian democracy?) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot