Re: Jim Geraghty on "Blood Libel"
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Bruce Geerdes wrote: >>> I dunno, in its generic sense, it does apply to blaming the right for >>> the shootings. >> >> If you consider the far right an "oppressed minority", I guess. > > More generic than that, as in the generic definitions of "blood" and > "libel". Ah, well, the examples cited here indicate that the "generic" use of the term doesn't have to involve blood at all! (Again I say: recounts??) Which means that you have to use the term *more* carefully, not *less*, when actual blood *is* involved. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot