The Soft Tyranny of Alphabetical Order
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2011/01/19/the-soft-tyranny-of-alphabetical-order/ > > JANUARY 19, 2011, 4:52 PM ET > > The Soft Tyranny of Alphabetical Order > > By Mary Pilon > > Blame it on your grade school gym class. > > The first letter of your last name may determine how quickly you > respond to limited buying opportunities as adults, according to > findings in the Journal of Consumer Research. > > > Getty Images > The alphabetical segregation begins in grade school. > The “last name effect,” as dubbed by Kurt A. Carlson of the > McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University andJacqueline > M. Conard at the Massey Graduate School of Business at Belmont > University, implies that those with last names that are filed > earlier (A – I) in the alphabet respond slower to buying > opportunities than those at the end of the line (R – Z). In > situations where people must queue up, those with last names at the > end of the alphabet are going to be faster, researchers say. > > “The psychological driver isn’t really about acquiring things,” > Prof. Carlson says. “It’s insurance that they get from the pain of > missing out.” > > The rationale is that those with last names at the end of the > alphabet become trained as kids to compensate for being last. The > Adams, Browns and Donaldsons of the world don’t need to rush since > they’re already at the front of the queue. But the Wilsons, Youngs > and Zwicks are constantly and the end of the line and will rush > ahead, when given the chance. > > In one of the researchers’ four experiments, people were emailed the > chance to get four free tickets to attend a highly-ranked women’s > basketball game. In order to get the tickets, students had to reply > ASAP via email since the tickets were in limited supply and offered > on a first-come, first-served basis. > > The average response time was 22.7 minutes. Those who had surnames > that began with one of the last nine letters of the alphabet was > 19.38 minutes and those with a surname from the first nine letters > of the alphabet was 25.08 minutes. > > Other surveys found similar results, including that women who change > their last names when they get married still respond according to > the last name they grew up with. Those of us in with last names that > fall in the middle of the alphabet, J through Q, will still respond > according to our place in the queue, researchers say. “It’s a > continuous line through the alphabet,” Prof. Carlson says, of the > results of response times through the experiments. > > Like any experiment, there are exceptions. And depending on your > experience as a child, the effect could be more or less muted. “But > alphabetization persists into adulthood,” Prof. Carlson says, > nothing things like magazine subscriptions being delayed. > > The body of work on names and their behavioral implications has > received some criticism. Some research has put name letters in > relationships with locations, preference for specific products or > even preferences in mates. The notion is that there’s an implicit > egoism in preferring things with the same letters as our own names. > Critics argue that a lot of these rules may result from geographic, > ethnic or other factors. > > Prof. Carlson says this research is different. “People named > Virginia might live in Virginia because they were named after the > place,” he says. “With this effect, I don’t think you can make that > reverse causality. That doesn’t mean there can’t be some other > process that’s different, but this is a fairly simple intuitive > account that would explain the data.” > > People who were in the middle of the alphabet were less likely to be > aware of whether alphabetical order was fair or not, the researchers > found. A greater number of those at the end of the alphabet were > likely to report that being at the front of the line was a big > advantage. > > Since the surveys looked at adults today reflecting on their > childhood, it’s interesting to wonder how much of this is > generational. Are schools using last names to organize less? Is the > notion self-reinforcing? Is the phenomena overblown? > > “No study is perfect,” Prof. Carlson says. “But my co-author’s > maiden name is Yates and she jumped at the chance to work on this > paper immediately.” > -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot