Re: [Scalzi] Oscar predictions 2011
pcg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> In my capacity as a professional film commentator of two decades standing >> — seriously, I started my job as a film critic in 1991, MAN I AM OLD — it’s >> time for my annual Oscar predictions. I suppose this is as good a place as any to vocalize something that's been brewing in my mind for the last few years. I really, really dislike this reductive, score-card prediction-making that so many critics engage in during Oscar season. I would soooooooo much rather see people who know something about film actually *talking about* the most notable films of the year, and *why* they should or should not win, rather than *whether* they will. When one starts by simply eliminating films for this statistical reason or that, we end up with is something like, "So I guess that leaves XXXXXX as the Best Picture winner." Really? Fascinating. *rolls eyes* I realize my criticism comes from an oblique angle, as the express(ed?) purpose of these articles is to make predictions, not start discussions. And yes, I know, it's a harmless game. Just seems like a rather boring one. The studios have already made the Oscars a horse-race for their industry -- let's not egg them on. Yours crotchetily, Old Man Glenn :) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot