Re: And I'm back...
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yea, but how often does the average person have any contact with the *civil* court system? The vast majority are going to be in divorce court which is a whole nuther ball o wax from normal civil courts. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:58 AM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] And I'm back... I think it has to be civil, (for the most part), since the right to a court appointed attorney is constitutionally mandated. Of course you don't have a right to a *good* attorney, but most court appointed attorneys I've come across do a very good job. It is the amount of resources they have at their disposal, (ie money), that makes the difference. You can be the best lawyer in the world but if you can't hire investigator's, experts, associates, jury consultants, etc. you are at a disadvantage against the state. Mike F. _____ From: Karl Swenson <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, April 20, 2011 12:48:24 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] And I'm back... First, I think we lost the concept of civil justice a long time ago. Criminal, that might be different. I wonder, did the survey specify “civil” court system, or were people left to determine that? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:36 AM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: [DADL-OT] And I'm back... to thinking my profession is a den of thieves: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/14/access-to-justice-in-us-a_n_762355.html Dick the Butcher was soooo right. Mike F. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot