Re: nit-pick

Johne Cook <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
If there's an understandable, sensible origin for a term (such as suped up),
I prefer educating people and then letting them write what they will.

The theory is that once a person who was ignorant of enlightenment
understands the origins of something, once they learn the truth, only
contrarians or lazy people will continue to willfully spell something
incorrectly. (See, for example, Daylight Saving Time instead of Daylight
SavingS Time.)

Yeah, it's an uphill swim, but if one can educate without descending into
utter GrammarNazi mode, I think it's worth the effort to educate people.
Whether people cooperate or not is up to them.

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |*
*


On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]>wrote:

> I think we should distinguish between this list and writing as a profession
> or vocation, which I think most of us do.  I've never thought about the make
> do one and I'm not sure where I'd have come down on it if I didn't look it
> up.  The English language does have some strange idiomatic stuff and you
> could make some argument about making due making sense in that you were
> making something for the time being IOW you were making it due right then
> and there so I could see myself making do with make due if I were whipping
> off a post.
>
> And the souped up vs suped up?  Are we so sure one is correct?  I know I
> have seen sup'ed up but I wouldn't think souped up was necessarily wrong for
> the reason Peter suggested.  Also you're dealing with cars, (in using that
> phrase), and who's to say it wasn't derived from coupe, (being a sportier
> version of a sedan), which would explain the ou.
>
> Exit question:  It is a bit much to require exacting standards for
> slang/short hand phrases?
>
> Mike F.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Karl Swenson <[email protected]>
> *To:* DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Mon, April 25, 2011 3:57:48 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] nit-pick
>
> Good one.  I never considered it.
>
>
>
> I have been really working on my lazy spelling habits, partly because you,
> my friends.
>
>
>
> I eschew irregardless completely.  I am very careful with my “it’s and
> its”, “then and than” and “their, there and they’re’.  Affect and effect,
> insure and ensure and many others.
>
>
>
> And I totally avoid texting and email short hand as much as I can, the ur,
> r, 4 instead of for etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Johne Cook
> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2011 9:15 AM
> *To:* DADL (off topic)
> *Subject:* Re: [DADL-OT] nit-pick
>
>
>
> Interesting commentary here:
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=make%20due
>
> I think it's another example of a homophone (and a case of some degree of
> illiteracy).
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophone
>
> My pet peeve here is 'souped up,' as in I supercharged the engine of a
> sports car, which would seem to be 'suped up,' but as people are hearing the
> word instead of seeing it, they spell the word they hear and not the correct
> word. I understand how it happens, and also understand I'm one of the only
> people who seems to make a big stink about this, so I'll let it go. As long
> as I can understand what somebody means, I'm fine. (I /guess./)
>
> Johne Cook
> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |*
> *
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Peter T. Chattaway <
> petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If American spelling errors are predicated on the notion that one should
> always use as few letters as possible ("color" instead of "colour",
> "see-thru" instead of "see-through", etc., etc.), then why do I keep seeing
> the non-existent phrase "make due" in some people's writing?
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
>
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.