Re: Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding...
Johne Cook <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And what did her campaign do with it? Nothing. It should have ended there. If there was anything legitimate to use, the Clintons would have exploited it. Johne Cook | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |* * On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]>wrote: > Well, not necessarily. First, I do not know if any of the previously > mentioned things would matter for "natural born" citizenship, the > presidency > is the only one I know of. > > Second, this issue was initially raised by Hillary's campaign, so the > democrats originally raised it on their own. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of pcg > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:08 PM > To: DADL (off topic) > Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding... > > > The burden of proof rests on the one who makes the assertion. If > > Obama is the one asserting that he was born in the U.S., then it is up > > to him to prove it, and no one is obliged to believe it just on his > > say-so. (Of course, we then get to the question of *standards* of > > proof...) > > > > By the same token, of course, if anyone was asserting that Obama was > > born in a specific place that was *not* the U.S., then the burden of > > proof would be on them to prove *that* assertion, too. And I guess > > Obama had to be born *somewhere*, so maybe *everyone* had a burden of > proof to meet. > > Perhaps. The thing is, Obama's citizenship had never been called into > question throughout his entire academic, professional, and political > career, > and then suddenly certain parties, who had a vested interest in him *not* > being a natural-born citizen, and for whom and for whom standard legal > documentation isn't good enough, started claiming that he *wasn't* a > citizen > -- based on nothing more than speculation. While I appreciate your ability > to see both sides of the argument, I think it's fair to say the burden of > proof rested with them. :) > > -- > -pcg > [email protected] > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot