Re: Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding...

Johne Cook <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
And what did her campaign do with it? Nothing. It should have ended there.
If there was anything legitimate to use, the Clintons would have exploited
it.

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |*
*


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]>wrote:

> Well, not necessarily.  First, I do not know if any of the previously
> mentioned things would matter for "natural born" citizenship, the
> presidency
> is the only one I know of.
>
> Second, this issue was initially raised by Hillary's campaign, so the
> democrats originally raised it on their own.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of pcg
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:08 PM
> To: DADL (off topic)
> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding...
>
> > The burden of proof rests on the one who makes the assertion.  If
> > Obama is the one asserting that he was born in the U.S., then it is up
> > to him to prove it, and no one is obliged to believe it just on his
> > say-so.  (Of course, we then get to the question of *standards* of
> > proof...)
> >
> > By the same token, of course, if anyone was asserting that Obama was
> > born in a specific place that was *not* the U.S., then the burden of
> > proof would be on them to prove *that* assertion, too.  And I guess
> > Obama had to be born *somewhere*, so maybe *everyone* had a burden of
> proof to meet.
>
> Perhaps. The thing is, Obama's citizenship had never been called into
> question throughout his entire academic, professional, and political
> career,
> and then suddenly certain parties, who had a vested interest in him *not*
> being a natural-born citizen, and for whom and for whom standard legal
> documentation isn't good enough, started claiming that he *wasn't* a
> citizen
> -- based on nothing more than speculation. While I appreciate your ability
> to see both sides of the argument, I think it's fair to say the burden of
> proof rested with them. :)
>
> --
> -pcg
>  [email protected]
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
>
> --
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.