Re: The President's Speech

Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The first reports were that it happened a week ago, but now it looks like it was 
sometime yesterday.  


The burial at sea thing is just weird.  Even if is means he was "buried" within 
24 hours he still ain't facing Mecca.  And isn't a lot of seafood unclean for 
Muslims?  


I saw though that even Al Qaeda is acknowledging his death, so the conspiracy 
thing may not be something we have to worry about.  Finally, I'm of two minds 
about the Muslim burial think.  On the one hand I'd like to have seen his body 
fed to the pigs, but on the other it demonstrates that we have more respect for 
a evil tyrants religious traditions than he had/has for 3,000 innocent 
civilians.

Mike F.   




________________________________
From: Karl Swenson <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 10:44:48 AM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] The President's Speech


I'm confused.  I thought this happened a few days ago and they delayed the 
release of his death until dna testing was done.  Or so early reports said.

Regardless, I think Obama will get credit for this and should as long as he 
shares the credit with all involved.

The burial at sea thing was a mistake though, IMHO, now we will have more 
conspiracies about this being a fake.

Also, and I expect to upset some, why are we so concerned about ensuring Bin 
Laden was buried in accordance to Muslim law?  According to all, he was not a 
true muslim, because Islam is a religion of peace.

If anything did we just grant him posthumous legitimacy to twisted belief 
system?

I am struggling to remain compassionate here.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 8:28 AM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] The President's Speech

I don't know.  I cringed a bit at the "I's" in Obama's speech but name a 
politician who wouldn't have been self promoting to some extent.  I think Steyn 
is nitpicking on this one.

Mike F.  




________________________________
From: Peter Chattaway <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Amos off-topic listserver <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 10:01:20 AM
Subject: [DADL-OT] The President's Speech

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/266184/presidents-speech-mark-steyn

May 2, 2011 9:16 A.M.
By Mark Steyn    

I know, I know, if you can’t blog anything real nice it’s better not to blog at 
all, that’s my advice. Nevertheless:

Personally, I would have liked bin Laden’s death to have been announced by 
whatever lowest-level official was manning the night desk at the Department of 
Nondescript Bureaucrats, preferably reading it off the back of an envelope. But, 
if you’re going to put the head of state on TV to announce it himself, it would 
have been better to have been all brisk and businesslike – “At 0800 hours 
American military assets entered an address at 27b Jihadist Gardens, etc” – and 
finish off with a bit of Churchillian sober uplift about it not being the end or 
the beginning of the end but maybe the end of the beginning.

Instead, as Stephen Hunter, the novelist and Washington Post film critic,
writes:

   Any joy one might feel in the intelligence of our analysts and the bravery of 
our door kickers was significantly diminished by Obama’s malignant narcissism. 

The first part of the announcement, evoking 9/11, was vulgarly overwritten as 
per Obama’s view of himself as some kind of gifted orator. The adjective bloated 
compote was unworthy of the subject, banal and self-indulgent.

I was, I confess, a little stunned by the first part of the President’s speech. 
It was, as Mr Hunter says, overwritten. It managed to be both overwrought and 
generic – all that telepromptered overload about cloudless Tuesday mornings was 
not only tackily over-prettified but came over as unfelt and hand-me-down, like 
a course exercise in some third-rate creative-writing school’s Soaring Oratory 
class. Or, at any rate, as if they’d loaded up a first draft of September’s 
tenth anniversary speech into the machine. The official announcement was delayed 
for all this? If ever there was a moment for the commander-in-chief to be real, 
plainspoken and off his glassy-eyed follow-the-bouncing-ball routine, this was 
it. It’s as if nobody around him knows how to write except in the one tinny key.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m happy to rally round the flag, and rally round the 
President, but rally round this speech? No thanks.


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.