Stop Raising the Debt Ceiling
"david white" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1868:stop-
raising-the-debt-ceiling&catid=62:texas-straight-talk&Itemid=69
Stop Raising the Debt Ceiling
The federal government once again has reached the limit of its legal ability
to borrow money, meaning it cannot issue new Treasury debt without action by
Congress to increase the debt ceiling limit. As of this month,
our official national debt- which doesnt include the staggering future
payments promised to Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries- stands at
$14.2 trillion.
The debt ceiling law, passed in 1917, enables Congress to place a statutory
cap on the total amount of government debt rather than having to approve each
individual Treasury bond offering. It also, however, forces Congress into an
open and presumably somewhat shameful vote to approve more borrowing. If the
new Republican majority in the House of Representatives gives in to
establishment pressure by voting to increase the debt ceiling once again, you
will know that the status quo has prevailed. You will know that the simple
notion of balancing the budget, by limiting federal spending to federal
revenue, remains a shallow and laughable campaign platitude.
It is predictable that Congress will once again merely delay the inevitable
and raise the debt ceiling, after the usual rhetoric about controlling
spending, making cuts, and yes, raising taxes. We have heard endless
warnings about how irresponsible it would be to shut down the government.
The implication is that sober, rational, mature pundits and politicians
understand reality, while those who oppose raising the debt ceiling limit are
reckless ideologues who will harm the economy just to make a point.
But like any debtor that has to reduce its spending, the federal government
simply needs to establish priorities and stop spending money on anything
other than those priorities. Interest payments on our federal bond debt
likely will amount to about $500 billion for fiscal year 2011, an average of
$41 billion per month. Federal tax revenues vary by month, but should total
around $2 trillion to $2.5 trillion for FY 2011-- an average of perhaps $180
billion per month. So clearly the federal government has sufficient tax
revenue to make interest payments to our creditors. For now, those interest
payments represent about 12% of the total federal budget.
What nobody wants to admit is this: even if the federal government has only
$1.5 trillion remaining to spend in 2011 after interest payments, this is
PLENTY to fund the constitutional functions of government. After all, the
entire federal budget in 1990 was about $1 trillion. Does anyone seriously
believe the federal government was too small or too frugal just 20 years
ago? Hardly. So why have we allowed the federal budget to quadruple during
those 20 years?
The truth is, in spite of how cataclysmic some might say it would be if we
did not pass a new debt ceiling, it is hardly the catastrophe that has been
advertised. The debt ceiling is a self-imposed limit on borrowing. The
signal congress sends to worldwide markets by raising the debt ceiling is
simple: business as usual will continue in Washington; no real spending cuts
will be made; and fiscal austerity will remain a pipe dream.
When our creditors finally wise up and cut us off, we will be forced to face
economic realities whether we want to or not. It would be easier to deal with
the tough choices we face now, on our own terms, rather than wait until we
are at the mercy of foreign creditors. However, leaders in Washington have
no political will to admit that we cannot afford to continue spending without
any meaningful limit. They prefer maintaining the illusion and putting off
reality for another day.
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot