Fwd: Re: TRUCE AND CONSEQUENCES

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, May 26, 2011 2:11 pm
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] TRUCE AND CONSEQUENCES

>And yet, Republicans go after Planned Parenthood who provide help to
women that
>prevents unintended pregnancies.  And imagine how many more single
moms there
>would be if abortion were hard to access...oh, wait, they are passing
>legislation on that as well.<

>That's kind of the same argument, in reverse, that social security
would be
solvent if 1.3 million children hadn't been aborted every year since
Roe v
>Wade.  Too many variables and too much speculation.

Or that we may have aborted the guy who was gonna cure cancer-hey, we
might have aborted the guy who was going to *murder* the guy who cures
cancer.  But my point is, why are Republicans working so hard to cancel
funding for the 97% of the work PP does?  They don't get any money for
abortions, it seems like it should be a non-issue.


>I find Steyn's portrayal of Republicans as constantly rolling over to
us
>liberals rather hard to buy.  All we see happen is Barak Obama argue
with
>Republicans until he gives them everything they want to get one thing
he wants.<

>Do you have something specific in mind as an example of this?

You must have missed all of last December when the Repblicans were
holding things like funding to help sick 9/11first responders.
Republicans sure have not rolled over on much that I have seen.  Even
when stuff the president wants to pass get through, it is hardly
because Republicans all voted in favor... Maybe a couple like Scott
Brown and Rand Paul did this week.


>And we cannot course correct with a better plan than Ryan's?  Steyn
seems to be
>under the impression that this is the case.<

Even Clinton agrees that at least Ryan is trying and worries that
Democrats will
>do absolutely nothing to fix the problem withe medicare, but continue
to
demagogue it for the purpose of campaigning.  I'm all for Ryan's plan,
but
>regardless of whether you agree with it or not you have to give him
credit for
the political courage to say what no one wants to hear.



Really?  I have to?  I would give give him credit if he had offered a
good plan.  Your comment seems along the lines of "we have to move this
500 lbs boulder.  Ryan said we should hit it with tennis balls.  You
have to give him credit for the courage of suggesting something!"
Anyone who supports privitizing healthcare really lacks an
understanding of the industry.  His plan tells seniors to find their
own healthcare in a field that wants neither the sick or the old.
Stellar plan.  Especially since it rolls back all the healthcare
reforms that might not make such a situation as hard.

Although I would not have agreed with the plan as good, I *would* have
been more willing to give him credit had he shown the same toughness on
defense spending.  If there was ever spending that needed to be reigned
in...

Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the
Bunnymen












-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.