Re: Marine killed in his own home

Right. As usual, you've anticipated and addressed my point. He had a gun in his hands because he intended to use it, either to inflict or threaten violence. If that was not the case, he would still be alive. That's all I'm saying. 



On May 27, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Johne Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

> Speaking for myself, in an area where home invasions were prevalent, if
> somebody broke into my house, I'd consider brandishing a weapon and, with
> appropriate warning, shoot the motherfucker three times center-mass. I trust
> that is specific enough for you. That may not be very Christian, but there
> it is. (Furthermore, so would have Mal Reynolds, but that's another
> thread.)  ;)
> 
> Johne Cook
> | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |*
> *
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Paul Christian Glenn <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> But this continues to evade the bottom line, which is *why* he even had a
>> sword... er, gun. *Why* did he grab it when he thought his house was being
>> invaded? What did he intend to do with it? And let's not employ vague,
>> non-useful terms like "defend his property," let's use specific
>> descriptions.
>> 
> -- 
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot