| Newsgroups |
gmane.music.dadl.ot |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
>That is absurd. How can he film something, edit it to change the entire
context and meaning and not know it? How is that NOT pathological?
>Breitbart might be sloppy and partisan, but that is not pathological.
>To Moore, the ends justify the means. He is one of the biggest fraudsters
>in movie making.
He (Breitbart) just works with Fraudsters? he's just a careless dupe? Than why is he trusted? He is guilty of manipulating information to support his sloppy partisanship...how is that different from Moore?
Hey, I started out seeing them as equals.
But the point is, just as I am suspect of something Michael Moore champions, I am immediately suspect of anything Breitbart puts out as fact.
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot