Tremolos last longer?

"James Freer" <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:58:41 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.music.equipment.harmonica.big-harmonica
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi folks

I'd be grateful if someone could explain why a tremolo lasts longer - if that is in fact true.

I understood from a posting a while back that

"Bending does not significantly stress reeds. Excess energy that the
reed cannot turn into sound is what stresses reeds. I've killed reeds
on tremolo harmonicas where I never bent a note, simply from too-loud
playing. Ditto chromatics. Some players have poor bending technique and
stress reeds because they hit too hard but that's not due to bending
per se." [quote by a competent harpist]

So if stressing reeds is caused by poor playing technique then diatonic. chromatic, tremolo doesn't necessarily last longer than one or the other.   Yet people quote a diatonic as lasting a year or at best 18 months, chromatic lasting years and a tremolo lasting 'longer than a diatonic'.

Any comments greatly appreciated. Only a beginner keen to know more!

~James [UK]


-- 
-
Free Email at http://www.MailPuppy.com
- Fraud Warning:  Never accept foreign checks/money orders



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Life without art & music? Keep the arts alive today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iuUuID/dnQLAA/n1hLAA/DoLolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->