Tremolos last longer?
"James Freer" <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:58:41 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.equipment.harmonica.big-harmonica |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi folks I'd be grateful if someone could explain why a tremolo lasts longer - if that is in fact true. I understood from a posting a while back that "Bending does not significantly stress reeds. Excess energy that the reed cannot turn into sound is what stresses reeds. I've killed reeds on tremolo harmonicas where I never bent a note, simply from too-loud playing. Ditto chromatics. Some players have poor bending technique and stress reeds because they hit too hard but that's not due to bending per se." [quote by a competent harpist] So if stressing reeds is caused by poor playing technique then diatonic. chromatic, tremolo doesn't necessarily last longer than one or the other. Yet people quote a diatonic as lasting a year or at best 18 months, chromatic lasting years and a tremolo lasting 'longer than a diatonic'. Any comments greatly appreciated. Only a beginner keen to know more! ~James [UK] -- - Free Email at http://www.MailPuppy.com - Fraud Warning: Never accept foreign checks/money orders ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Life without art & music? Keep the arts alive today at Network for Good! http://us.click.yahoo.com/iuUuID/dnQLAA/n1hLAA/DoLolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->