| Newsgroups |
gmane.music.equipment.korg |
| Organization |
The Tempests |
| Message-ID |
<013101c7e0e3$5c026f90$14074eb0$@com> |
I own both and I like both for different reasons. Triton has a touch screen
which is very nice and it has a sampler, if you need one.
Karma, on the other hand has Stephen Kay, meaning Karma. While it does not
have the touch screen, or sampling, it has the Triton engine so all the
Triton sounds work on it. But the Huge feature is Karma technology. Once you
are hooked on that, the Triton is inferior.
For me, if I was to keep one unit, it would be the Karma.
Tom
This is all I know.....
If you want a sampler of any type, don't get the KARMA, it is not a sampler.
If you want the real-time algorithmic phrase composition, don't get the
TRITON, it is not that.....
Bob
El Segundo, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: victorhristovatanassov
To: [email protected] <mailto:korgkarma%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 1:08 AM
Subject: [korgkarma] TRITON LE vs KARMA
Need your opinion about these two workstations, that in some points
look and sound identical.Want to know the pluses and the minuses of
the two,what's inside in the one that the other doesn't have.Want to
add that the TRITON le is with an onboard sampler,SCSI( 64MB RAM).
Cheers!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/korgkarma/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/korgkarma/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/