Re: Axon ax 50 vs triple play
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.equipment.midi-guitar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Technology is the same because it is physics. But as Andras Szalay wrote here (as I remember) FTP has 1000 more power and it has faster algorithms so it can better predict errors, mistakes etc. At the end FTP plays better because it is cleaner. I had Yamaha G-50 and it was fast (=Axon without piezzo support) but Roland GR-55 with was slower was more playable. TriplePlay is as fast Axon and it works even if you play sloppy. plus A. Szalay wrote on VG Forum: "Of course, the radio transmission has a latency of its own, but this is only 0.5 msec; this is included in the numbers what I submitted.” So you must try it) FTP+USB Host+hardware synthesizer Spider > On 11 lut 2015, at 13:40, Pje [email protected] [midiguitar] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A person Fishman told me it is basically just the same technology. Does the wireless slow it down? I have an axon AX50 and a original axon rackmount, (Blue-chip, pre-TeraTech). The 50 is measurably quicker and better to external sources. > I would like somebody to test the 50 versus the triple play. > > Voice to text on Peters phone. > > >