Re: Re: yamaha ezeg

"[email protected] [midiguitar]" <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:03:59 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.music.equipment.midi-guitar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
No need to go nuclear.
1) Where did I claim they were  the same ?
2) Where did I claim that the SynthAxe uses patches ?
I merely asked if there are any patches available anybody know that 
MODELS the SynthAxe.
A big difference to what you harp about.

Sorry I asked, but your answer completely missed what I tried to 
accomplish.

Maybe you should have kept the SynthAxe and no hang onto the EZEG toy 
(sic).

I would appreciate anyone else with constructive answers to the 
questions I posed without placing words into my mouth.

thanks



On 2017-03-08 23:54, [email protected] [midiguitar] wrote:
> An ezeg in no way resembles a 'SynthAxe'.  The SynthAxe had no
> 'patches' at all. It was a very expensive controller, and about as
> similar to an ezeg as a 40's banjo is to a Strat Plus..
>  The frets were split diagonally and allowed very controllable string
> bends.   An ezeg is more similar to a Starr Labs Ztar, and indeed
> Yamaha infringed Starr Labs switch application patents when making the
> ezeg.
> Look on youtube for ezeg.  I have owned both, (SynthAxe with all pedal
> and controller options, and I still have an ezeg)  IMO the ezeg is a
> toy, and not an instrument.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------
>  Posted by: [email protected]
> -------------------------


------------------------------------
Posted by: [email protected]
------------------------------------

--to unsubscribe send a blank message to [email protected]