Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 0'00" is a joke...
matteo pittoni <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:03:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.john-cage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ_EvB9QP=D5Thgro-NMGMQa+D0piCoxRVtX0NmJVgcMHroCuw@mail.gmail.com> |
As the partition talks about performing an *action*, and we try to recall the devotion to rational thought always showed by John Cage, I believe there is no reason to think that it should last *zero seconds*. As for the reason of the title, maybe he used this to suggest the *absence*of a time measure : thus, a temporal indeterminacy. In 4'33', there was a constraint on duration, but no constraint on any action ; maybe 0'00'' is meant to constrain the action (which must be * disciplined*) but not duration... Best regards, Matteo On 25 October 2011 22:38, David Badagnani <[email protected]> wrote: > Great discussion. I can't think of any better use for this list! > > If 0'00" is not the duration of the piece, why is it entitled that? From > all this discussion, I'm still not sure I understand that. Is the lack of > time in the title metaphorical? And is there not at least a hint of humor? > First came the white paintings, then the silent piece of 4 minutes and 33 > seconds' duration, then the very loud piece of no duration...it simply seems > to be taking an idea to its logical extreme. > > -- > David Badagnani > Kent, Ohio > USA > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Matt Rogalsky <[email protected]> > *To:* Vitor Rua <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:09 PM > *Subject:* [silence] Re: Re: Re: 0'00" is a joke... > > OK, you pulled me in to make one more reply. > > On 2011-10-25, at 4:01 PM, Vitor Rua wrote: > > > oh pleaseeeeeee... not even einstein will think that this composition > must be performed... unless they perform on a warm whole or > something...theres no DURATION !!!!! > > The title of this piece is not its duration. The score instructions make > that clear. > > >> think of some of the more abstract Fluxus era compositions by La Monte > Young and others, for instance, which really are not really performable in a > concert hall sense). > > > > I have performed almost all the pieces > > But not all.. because some cannot be performed in a concert-hall sense. > Such as: "This piece is little whirlpools in the middle of the ocean" > (that's from memory, please forgive if I am paraphrasing) > > OK, bye! That's the end of my contribution to this discussion! > > in friendship, > Matt R > >