Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 0'00" is a joke...
Mark Kolmar <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:07:34 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.john-cage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All -- I would call 0'00" a composition about compositions, words about music, like a review of a style, or a plea for a kind of music made after the pattern that the score describes. A lot of Fluxus, in practice, ranges from poetry to advice. That is fine and useful. Sometimes I feel that the discussion on these topics falls into semantics as much as concepts. --Mark On 10/25/2011 1:40 PM, Rob Haskins wrote: > Sorry, I accidentally sent this only to wonderful Vitor: > > With all due respect to Vitor, I would call 0'00" a composition. It's > not conventionally musical, but its instructions (to perform a > disciplined action at the highest level of amplification before feedback > occurs) ensure that the piece is about the sounds produced. > > The concept of organized sound, for Cage, largely disappears once Cage > embraces chance operations. For at this point, any continuity (read: > organization) becomes acceptable /(Lecture on Something/). > > Sorry I can't write more on this at the moment. > > Best, > Rob > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Jim Flannery <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 11:08:00 AM, one wrote: > > > if you create organized sound performing 0`00``you are performing it > > wrong !!! > > So when Cage performed the piece, he was doing it wrong? > > I think you've under-understood the score.