Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 0'00" is a joke...
Vitor Rua <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:13:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.john-cage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
you are absolutly right dear mark... best regards... vitor rua On 25 Oct 2011, at 23:07, Mark Kolmar wrote: > All -- > > I would call 0'00" a composition about compositions, words about > music, like a review of a style, or a plea for a kind of music made > after the pattern that the score describes. A lot of Fluxus, in > practice, ranges from poetry to advice. That is fine and useful. > Sometimes I feel that the discussion on these topics falls into > semantics as much as concepts. > > --Mark > > On 10/25/2011 1:40 PM, Rob Haskins wrote: >> Sorry, I accidentally sent this only to wonderful Vitor: >> >> With all due respect to Vitor, I would call 0'00" a composition. It's >> not conventionally musical, but its instructions (to perform a >> disciplined action at the highest level of amplification before >> feedback >> occurs) ensure that the piece is about the sounds produced. >> >> The concept of organized sound, for Cage, largely disappears once >> Cage >> embraces chance operations. For at this point, any continuity (read: >> organization) becomes acceptable /(Lecture on Something/). >> >> Sorry I can't write more on this at the moment. >> >> Best, >> Rob >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Jim Flannery <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 11:08:00 AM, one wrote: >> >> > if you create organized sound performing 0`00``you are >> performing it >> > wrong !!! >> >> So when Cage performed the piece, he was doing it wrong? >> >> I think you've under-understood the score.