RE: A troubling patent that SCO was granted

Mattias Sandström <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Sep 2003 08:23:35 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.bb4.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Reading the list of claims in the patent, I see a description of M$'s
"Windows Update" function. Maybe we can get Bill to chuck in $500k to a
bunch of suits and have them put an end to SCO's non-sense-suing (are they
out of business ideas and must protect the value of the stocks?!?)

/Mattias



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen L Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 05:45
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: {bbd} A troubling patent that SCO was granted
> 
> 
> I've been follow the SCO vs IBM case and side battles with a
> professional and personal interest. Normally I wouldn't ever think of
> mentioning it here. But I found this bit of news at GROKLAW, a blog
> about the SCO case. http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/
> 
> The news is of a patent that SCO received in March. There is a link to
> the patent at the PTO web site.
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HIT
OFF&u=/netahtml/search-adv.htm&r=3&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&p=1&S1=Caldera&OS=Cal
dera&RS=Caldera

This patent has claims that covers what Big Brother, my own Spong
package do and numerous other commercial and Open Source System/Network
Monitoring and Centralized System Configuration Management packages.

I'm still not sure of what to make it: being concernedwith being sued or
laughing my head off.
 
-- 
Stephen L Johnson <[email protected]>

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list send e-mail to mailto:[email protected]
with unsubscribe bbd in the BODY of the message.