RE: A troubling patent that SCO was granted
Mattias Sandström <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Sep 2003 08:23:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.bb4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Reading the list of claims in the patent, I see a description of M$'s "Windows Update" function. Maybe we can get Bill to chuck in $500k to a bunch of suits and have them put an end to SCO's non-sense-suing (are they out of business ideas and must protect the value of the stocks?!?) /Mattias > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen L Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 05:45 > To: [email protected] > Subject: {bbd} A troubling patent that SCO was granted > > > I've been follow the SCO vs IBM case and side battles with a > professional and personal interest. Normally I wouldn't ever think of > mentioning it here. But I found this bit of news at GROKLAW, a blog > about the SCO case. http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/ > > The news is of a patent that SCO received in March. There is a link to > the patent at the PTO web site. > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HIT OFF&u=/netahtml/search-adv.htm&r=3&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&p=1&S1=Caldera&OS=Cal dera&RS=Caldera This patent has claims that covers what Big Brother, my own Spong package do and numerous other commercial and Open Source System/Network Monitoring and Centralized System Configuration Management packages. I'm still not sure of what to make it: being concernedwith being sued or laughing my head off. -- Stephen L Johnson <[email protected]> -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list send e-mail to mailto:[email protected] with unsubscribe bbd in the BODY of the message.